🏀 With increasing obesity, fat mass accounts for an increasing amount of TBW, and the LBW/TBW ratio decreases
🏀 TBW is defined as the actual weight
🏀 IBW is what the patient should weigh with a normal ratio of lean to fat mass
🏀 IBW can be estimated from the formula: IBW (kg) = Height(cm) − x ( where x = 100 for adult males and 105 for adult females).
🏀 LBM is the patient's weight , excluding fat
🏀Male LBM = 1.1(weight)-128(weight/height)^2 (Weight in Kg and Height in cm)
🏀Female LBM = 1.07 (weight) -148 (weight/height)^2
🏀Regardless of total body weight, lean body weight rarely exceeds 100 kg in men and 70 kg in women
🏀 Below IBW, TBW and LBM are similar.
🏀 Adjusted body weight (ABW) Takes into account the fact that obese individuals have increased lean body mass and an increased volume of distribution for drugs.
🏀 It is calculated by adding 40% of the excess weight to the IBW :
ABW (kg) = IBW (kg) + 0.4 (TBW (kg) IBW (kg)
🏀 Drugs with weak or moderate lipophilicity can be dosed on the basis of IBW or more accurately on LBM. These values are not same in obese; because 20–40% of an obese patient's increase in TBW can be attributed to an increase in LBM. Adding 20% to the 'estimated IBW based dose' of hydrophilic medication is sufficient to include the extra lean mass. Non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs can be dosed in this manner.
🏀 In morbidly obese patients, the induction dose of propofol can be calculated on IBW.
🏀 In case of midazolam, prolonged sedation can occur from the larger initial dose needed to achieve adequate serum concentrations.
🏀 Remifentanil dosing regimens should be based on IBW or LBM and not on TBW.
🏀 When using succinylcholine in obese adults or adolescents, dosage should be calculated on TBW
🏀 The antagonism time of neostigmine has been shown to be independent of TBW and BMI. Therefore, TBW can be used to calculate the dose.
Ref:Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Peri-operative management of the obese surgical patient 2015. Anaesthesia 2015, 70, pages 859–876.
http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/105/suppl_1/i16.full
No comments:
Post a Comment